<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Angelo's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hongens.nl/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hongens.nl</link>
	<description>A systems administrator's diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Graphing requests per second out of apache log files by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/2009/03/19/graphing-requests-per-second-out-of-apache-log-files/comment-page-1/#comment-39998</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?p=86#comment-39998</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, the timestamps being out of order is because of the difference between the time at which a request starts (the timestamp on the log line) and when it finishes (which is when it&#039;s written into the log line).

This is very useful information.  It may not be something you want for your current purpose, but it would be a shame to throw this information away.

It&#039;s very useful to be able to identify the log lines where the timestamp recorded is significantly behind the latest timestamp seen by that point in the logs, as this identifies the long running requests, which are likely to be performance issues on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, the timestamps being out of order is because of the difference between the time at which a request starts (the timestamp on the log line) and when it finishes (which is when it&#8217;s written into the log line).</p>
<p>This is very useful information.  It may not be something you want for your current purpose, but it would be a shame to throw this information away.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very useful to be able to identify the log lines where the timestamp recorded is significantly behind the latest timestamp seen by that point in the logs, as this identifies the long running requests, which are likely to be performance issues on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting up OpenVPN using radius on FreeBSD by krzee</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/setting-up-openvpn-using-radius-on-freebsd/comment-page-1/#comment-39460</link>
		<dc:creator>krzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=42#comment-39460</guid>
		<description>a) you only need a bridge when you have a layer2 protocol going over the vpn.  If using IP traffic use tun so you have less overhead and layer2 attacks will not work over the vpn.

b) 2.1.1 has the windows gui built in, www.openvpn.net/download
the .se link is no longer up to date

sorry for the doublepost, i had a typo to fix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) you only need a bridge when you have a layer2 protocol going over the vpn.  If using IP traffic use tun so you have less overhead and layer2 attacks will not work over the vpn.</p>
<p>b) 2.1.1 has the windows gui built in, <a href="http://www.openvpn.net/download" rel="nofollow">http://www.openvpn.net/download</a><br />
the .se link is no longer up to date</p>
<p>sorry for the doublepost, i had a typo to fix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting up OpenVPN using radius on FreeBSD by krzee</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/setting-up-openvpn-using-radius-on-freebsd/comment-page-1/#comment-39459</link>
		<dc:creator>krzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=42#comment-39459</guid>
		<description>a) you only need a bridge when you have a layer2 protocol going over the vpn.  If using IP traffic use tun so you have less overhead and layer2 attacks will not work over the vpn.

b) 2.1.1 has the windows gui built in, www.openvpn.net/download
the .se link is no longer up to date</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) you only need a bridge when you have a layer2 protocol going over the vpn.  If using IP traffic use tun so you have less overhead and layer2 attacks will not work over the vpn.</p>
<p>b) 2.1.1 has the windows gui built in, <a href="http://www.openvpn.net/download" rel="nofollow">http://www.openvpn.net/download</a><br />
the .se link is no longer up to date</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36927</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36927</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I figured out the record too long thing&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the answer was......?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I figured out the record too long thing</p></blockquote>
<p>And the answer was&#8230;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by Arch Willingham</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36729</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36729</guid>
		<description>Oh well....thanks anyway!
Arch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well&#8230;.thanks anyway!<br />
Arch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by angelo</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36721</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36721</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use RPC over http, I only use OWA.. Can&#039;t help you with that, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use RPC over http, I only use OWA.. Can&#8217;t help you with that, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by Arch Willingham</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36718</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36718</guid>
		<description>I figured out the record too long thing....now I&#039;m stuck with the certificate problems (or whatever ever is keeping them from talking). OWA works but Outlook HTTP/RPC flat will not work  How did you do your certificates?.

Arch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured out the record too long thing&#8230;.now I&#8217;m stuck with the certificate problems (or whatever ever is keeping them from talking). OWA works but Outlook HTTP/RPC flat will not work  How did you do your certificates?.</p>
<p>Arch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by angelo</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36716</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36716</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t know, try http://www.google.com/search?q=squid+ssl_error_rx_record_too_long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t know, try <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=squid+ssl_error_rx_record_too_long" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=squid+ssl_error_rx_record_too_long</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protect OWA using a reverse proxy by Arch Willingham</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/protect-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-36701</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?page_id=70#comment-36701</guid>
		<description>I have tried this and I can&#039;t get it to work.  I get errors about 

An error occurred during a connection to owa.oursite.com.

SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.

(Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)


Then the /var/log/httpd/error_log   shows these errors:

[Mon Jan 25 20:36:05 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:05 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:22 2010] [error] [client 68.186.192.18] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:26 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:26 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01

Any ideas?

Arch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried this and I can&#8217;t get it to work.  I get errors about </p>
<p>An error occurred during a connection to owa.oursite.com.</p>
<p>SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.</p>
<p>(Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)</p>
<p>Then the /var/log/httpd/error_log   shows these errors:</p>
<p>[Mon Jan 25 20:36:05 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01<br />
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:05 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01<br />
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:22 2010] [error] [client 68.186.192.18] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01<br />
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:26 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01<br />
[Mon Jan 25 20:36:26 2010] [error] [client 68.60.30.212] Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
<p>Arch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Graphing requests per second out of apache log files by angelo</title>
		<link>http://blog.hongens.nl/2009/03/19/graphing-requests-per-second-out-of-apache-log-files/comment-page-1/#comment-36662</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hongens.nl/?p=86#comment-36662</guid>
		<description>The link works for me, but here&#039;s a mirror: http://files.hongens.nl/2010/01/23/requests.rb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link works for me, but here&#8217;s a mirror: <a href="http://files.hongens.nl/2010/01/23/requests.rb" rel="nofollow">http://files.hongens.nl/2010/01/23/requests.rb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
